Khaldi Mac OS

Provided to YouTube by EMPIRE Distribution Khalil Mac MoneyMarr Taedoe Jugg Exotic Habits ℗ 2020 1019 GS Released on: 2020-01-31 Auto-generated by YouTube. Khaldi N, Seifuddin FT, Turner G, Haft D, Nierman WC, et al. (2010) SMURF: Genomic mapping of fungal secondary metabolite clusters. Fungal Genet Biol 47: 736–741. PMC free article PubMed.

Index pages

Articles

Policy Files

By country

Our Partners

Community resources

courage is contagious

On Sunday April 24, 2011 WikiLeaks began publishing 779 secret files from the notorious Guantanamo Bay prison camp. The details for every detainee will be released daily over the coming month.

The nearly 800 documents in WikiLeaks' latest release of classified US documents are memoranda from Joint Task Force Guantánamo (JTF-GTMO), the combined force in charge of the US 'War on Terror' prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, to US Southern Command, in Miami, Florida, regarding the disposition of the prisoners.

Khaldi Mac Os Catalina

Written between 2002 and 2008, the memoranda were all marked as 'secret,' and their subject was whether to continue holding a prisoner, or whether to recommend his release (described as his 'transfer' -- to the custody of his own government, or that of some other government). They were obviously not conclusive in and of themselves, as final decisions about the disposition of prisoners were taken at a higher level, but they are very significant, as they represent not only the opinions of JTF-GTMO, but also the Criminal Investigation Task Force, created by the Department of Defense to conduct interrogations in the 'War on Terror,' and the BSCTs, the behavioral science teams consisting of psychologists who had a major say in the 'exploitation' of prisoners in interrogation.

Under the heading, 'JTF-GTMO Detainee Assessment,' the memos generally contain nine sections, describing the prisoners as follows, although the earlier examples, especially those dealing with prisoners released -- or recommended for release -- between 2002 and 2004, may have less detailed analyses than the following:

1. Personal information

Each prisoner is identified by name, by aliases, which the US claims to have identified, by place and date of birth, by citizenship, and by Internment Serial Number (ISN). These long lists of numbers and letters -- e.g. US9YM-000027DP -- are used to identify the prisoners in Guantánamo, helping to dehumanize them, as intended, by doing away with their names. The most significant section is the number towards the end, which is generally shortened, so that the example above would be known as ISN 027. In the files, the prisoners are identified by nationality, with 47 countries in total listed alphabetically, from 'az' for Afghanistan to 'ym' for Yemen.

2. Health

This section describes whether or not the prisoner in question has mental health issues and/or physical health issues. Many are judged to be in good health, but there are some shocking examples of prisoners with severe mental and/or physical problems.

3. JTF-GTMO Assessment

a. Under 'Recommendation,' the Task Force explains whether a prisoner should continue to be held, or should be released.
b. Under 'Executive Summary,' the Task Force briefly explains its reasoning, and, in more recent cases, also explains whether the prisoner is a low, medium or high risk as a threat to the US and its allies and as a threat in detention (i.e. based on their behavior in Guantánamo), and also whether they are regarded as of low, medium or high intelligence value.
c. Under 'Summary of Changes,' the Task Force explains whether there has been any change in the information provided since the last appraisal (generally, the prisoners are appraised on an annual basis).

4. Detainee's Account of Events

Based on the prisoners' own testimony, this section puts together an account of their history, and how they came to be seized, in Afghanistan, Pakistan or elsewhere, based on their own words.

5. Capture Information

This section explains how and where the prisoners were seized, and is followed by a description of their possessions at the time of capture, the date of their transfer to Guantánamo, and, spuriously, 'Reasons for Transfer to JTF-GTMO,' which lists alleged reasons for the prisoners' transfer, such as knowledge of certain topics for exploitation through interrogation. The reason that this is unconvincing is because, as former interrogator Chris Mackey (a pseudonym) explained in his book The Interrogators, the US high command, based in Camp Doha, Kuwait, stipulated that every prisoner who ended up in US custody had to be transferred to Guantánamo -- and that there were no exceptions; in other words, the 'Reasons for transfer' were grafted on afterwards, as an attempt to justify the largely random rounding-up of prisoners.

6. Evaluation of Detainee's Account

In this section, the Task Force analyzes whether or not they find the prisoners' accounts convincing.

7. Detainee Threat

This section is the most significant from the point of view of the supposed intelligence used to justify the detention of prisoners. After 'Assessment,' which reiterates the conclusion at 3b, the main section, 'Reasons for Continued Detention,' may, at first glance, look convincing, but it must be stressed that, for the most part, it consists of little more than unreliable statements made by the prisoners' fellow prisoners -- either in Guantánamo, or in secret prisons run by the CIA, where torture and other forms of coercion were widespread, or through more subtle means in Guantánamo, where compliant prisoners who were prepared to make statements about their fellow prisoners were rewarded with better treatment. Some examples are available on the homepage for the release of these documents: http://wikileaks.ch/gitmo/

With this in mind, it should be noted that there are good reasons why Obama administration officials, in the interagency Guantánamo Review Task Force established by the President to review the cases of the 241 prisoners still held in Guantánamo when he took office, concluded that only 36 could be prosecuted.

The final part of this section, 'Detainee’s Conduct,' analyzes in detail how the prisoners have behaved during their imprisonment, with exact figures cited for examples of 'Disciplinary Infraction.'

8. Detainee Intelligence Value Assessment

After reiterating the intelligence assessment at 3b and recapping on the prisoners' alleged status, this section primarily assesses which areas of intelligence remain to be 'exploited,' according to the Task Force.

Khaldi Mac Os X

9. EC Status

Khaldi Mac Os X

The final section notes whether or not the prisoner in question is still regarded as an 'enemy combatant,' based on the findings of the Combatant Status Review Tribunals, held in 2004-05 to ascertain whether, on capture, the prisoners had been correctly labeled as 'enemy combatants.' Out of 558 cases, just 38 prisoners were assessed as being 'no longer enemy combatants,' and in some cases, when the result went in the prisoners' favor, the military convened new panels until it got the desired result.

Khaldi Mac OS